The petitioners requested withdrawal of the writ petition under PIL No. 24 of 2007. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-: 1 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 24 OF 2007
Ambapada Gramseva Mandal & Ors..... Petitioners.
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Ors... .... Respondents.
Mr.V.P.Vaidya for the Petitioners.
Ms.Sarita Shah i/byM/s. Motiwala & Co.,
for Respondent No.2.
Mr. R.V.Govilkar for Respondent No.4.
Mr.Aspi Chinoy i/by M/s. ANS Law Associates
for Respondent No.5.
CORAM : SWATANTER KUMAR, C.J. &
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
DATED : 13TH SEPTEMBER, 2007.
P.C.:
Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners
wishes to withdraw this petition. Writ Petition is,
accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/-
CHIEFJUSTICE
Sd/-
DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
Ambapada Gramseva Mandal & Ors.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Swatanter Kumar
D.Y. Chandrachud
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court