The writ petition seeking quashing of an award was dismissed for default due to the non-appearance of the petitioners and their counsel on the date of hearing.
Dismissal of Writ Petition No. 26876 of 2006 for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction) m
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER |fo TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 26876 OF 2006
Between:
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or a writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Cetiorari after calling for the recordsfrom the Hon'ble Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Visakhaatnam and quash the Award in I.D.no.103 of 2003 dt. 01.08.006.
I.A. NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP. NO: 34537 OF 2006)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court
Award passed by the Hon'ble the operation of the may be pleased to stay and quash the Award industrial Tribunal, Visakhapatnam labour Court-cum in l.D.no.103of -2003dt.01.08.2006.
;SR1 K SRINIVASA MURTHY Counsel for the Petitioner(s): ; GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondent No.1 M BHASKARA LAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent No.2: M/s
;ORDER The Court made the following
[3504]
<A
APHC010082702006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 26876/2006
Between:
Hooghli Mills Projects Ltd., And Another and Others
...PETITIONER{S)
AND
The Presidieng Officer Industrial Tribunal And Another and Others
...RESPONDENT{S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.K SRINIVASA MURTHY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR LABOUR
2.M BHASKARA LAKSHMI
The Court made the following;
4
2
M
ORDER:-
On 19.10.2024 & 26.10.2024, there was no representation for the
petitioners.
- On the last occasion also i.e. on 07.11.2024, there was no representation for the petitioners and the matter was adjourned to today i.e. 14.11.2024 under the caption ‘For Dismissal’.
- Today, the matter is listed under the caption ‘ForDismissal’.
- Despite the fact that the matter is listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioners.
- Ms. Swathi Guda, learned counsel representing Ms. M.Bhaskara Lakshmi, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 is present.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
//true copy//
Sp/. SHAIK n/IOHD. RAFI assistant registrar F^^section officer
To,
nm
HIGH COURT
DATED: 14/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.26876 of 2006
I 0 3 MAY 2025 <br>^ . Current Section
DISMISING THE WP FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS
Hooghli Mills Projects Limited
Hooghli Mills Projects Limited
The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-labour Court, Visakhapatnam
V.V. Ganesh
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
