A writ petition filed by a former employee seeking reinstatement in LIC was dismissed as infructuous on the primary ground that the petitioner had expired, causing the cause of action to no longer survive for consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 23825 OF 2005
Between:
Salagala Venkata Ramana, S/o. Late Eswara Rao, agedabout43years,R/o. D,No.8-9-13 A, Lingarao Street, Balajiraopet, Tenali,GunturDistrict.
(CT is amended as per Court Order dt. 28/11/05 in WPMPNo.31369/05)
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indiaisfiledpraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filedtherewith,theHigh Court may be pleased to issue a writ, direction, orderororders more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamuscallingfortherecords pertaining to the impugned order dt. 12.01.2002 passed by the 1st res pondent confirming the termination order dt. 07.04.2001passedbythe 2nd respondent and set aside same as illegal, arbitrary, malafide and violation of Art. 311(2) of the Constitution of Indiaand consequentially
‘ft
Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to allow the petitioner to perform the duty pending disposal of the above W.P., in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI BATHULA RAJ KIRAN (SC FOR LIC)
ff
APHC010022002005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3504]
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 23825/2005
Between:
...PETITIONER
...RESPONDENT(S):
Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.BATHULA RAJ KIRAN (SC FOR LIC ) 2.D S VG NAGARAJU The Court made the following:
2
ORDER;
It is represented by Sri A.Chandraiah Naidu, learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner expired and, hence,
the cause in this writ petition does not survive forconsideration. 2. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any.
pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- B CHITTI JOSEPH ASSI S ECTITANTJ^GISTRAROFFICER
To
TF
HIGH COURT
DATED:08/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.23825 of 2005
DISMISSING THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS
Salagala Venkata Ramana
The Chairman Cum Managing Director, LIC of India
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
