Dismissed

K.S.R. Anjaneyulu, Guntur District v. the District Educational Officer, Guntur & 3 Others

Andhra Pradesh HC6 Nov 2024WP/3009/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed Writ Petition No. 3009 of 2007 and related miscellaneous applications as infructuous. The court held that the petitioner appears in the order without substantive content to adjudicate.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition and pending miscellaneous petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

K.S.R. Anjaneyulu, Guntur District Vs the… — Service and Employment | Andhra Pradesh HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI

¶2

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR j PRESENT '

¶4

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 3009 OF 2007

¶5

Between:

¶6

K.S.R. Anjaneyulu, S/o. Subba Rao, aged 47 years, Second Grade Assistant, Aided Elementary School, Srungarapuram, R/o. D.No. 4-322/17, Eastern Choultry, Bapatia, Guntur District.

¶7

...PETITIONER

¶8

AND

¶9

The District Educational Officer, Guntur.

¶10

The Correspondent, Aided Elementary School, Srungarapuram, Bapatia Mandal, Guntur District.

¶11

Sri M. Ramalingam, District Educational Officer,^Guntur.

¶12

Sri A.V. Rajeswara Rao, Manager and Correspondent,^Aided Elementary School, Srungarapuam, Bapatia, Guntur District.

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction particularly^{oneinthenatureof} Writ of Mandamus declaring the order passed by the^{DistrictEducational} Officer, Guntur in Rc.No. 9411/C4/06 dated 25-1-2007 as illegal, arbitrary and directly contrary to the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Education Act of

¶15

1982 and the Rules made there under and also the action of the Manager and Correspondent of the Aided Elementary School, Srungarapuram, *5 f-Bapatia giving the petitioner posting as a Secondary Grade Assistant by his Proceedings dated 04-2-2007 in stead of posting him as Head Master from which post he has been reverted as illegal and arbitrary and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶16

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2007fWPMP. NO: 3865 OF 2007)

¶17

¶18

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2007fWPMP. NO: 3866 OF 2007)

¶19

¶20

I.A. NO: 3 OF 2007fWPMP. NO: 5335 OF 20071

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstances} stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order of the District Educational Officer, Guntur passed in Rc.No. 9411/C4/2006 dated 25-1-2007 pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶22

¶23

I.A. NO: 4 OF 2007(WPMP. NO: 5336 OF 2007)

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to pay the petitioner leave salary for the period from 20-6-2006 to 03-10-2006 and also full salary for the period of suspension i.e. from 4-10-2006 to 4-2-2007 pending disposal of the writ petition.

¶25

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2008rWPMP. NO: 4274 OF 20081

¶26

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the petitioner salary for the period from 01.08.2006 to 15.8.2006, medical leave salary from 16.8.2006 to 03.10.2006 and salary for the suspension period from 04.10.2006 to 03.02.2007 pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such other order or orders.

¶27

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP. NO: 2067 OF 20101

¶28

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased receive this Additional Affidavit and treat it as a part of the Affidavit filed in Writ Petition for proper adjudication^ofthe case. Counsel for the PetitionerSRI M PANDURANGA RAO Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR EDUCATION Counsel for the Respondents No.2,4: SRI O MANOHER REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI P PHALGUNA RAO The Court made the following: ORDER

APHC010383372007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶33

[3504]

¶34

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶35

THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶36

PRESENT

¶37

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶38

WRIT PETITION NO: 3QQ9/2QQ7

¶39

Between;

¶40

K.s.r. Anjaneyulu, Guntur District

¶41

...PETITIONER

¶42

AND

¶43

The District Educational Officer Guntur 3 Others and Others

¶44

...RESPONDENT(S)

¶45

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶46

1.M PANDURANGA RAO

¶47

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶48

1.GP FOR EDUCATION

¶49

2.GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION

¶50

3.0 MANOHER REDDY

¶51

4.PPHALGUNARAO

¶52

The Court made the following Order:

¶53

Sri Challa Hruday Raj, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

¶54

petitioner submits that the present Writ Petition has become Infructuous.

¶55

Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as

¶56

infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶57

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand

¶58

closed.

¶59

//TRUE COPY//

¶60

SD/-G. HELA NAIDU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶61

SECTION OFFICER

¶62

To,

¶63

OneCCto SRI. M. PANDURANGA RAO, Advocate [OPUC]

¶64

One CC to SRI. P. PHALGUNA RAO, Advocate [OPUC]

¶65

Two CCs to GP FOR EDUCATION ,High Court of Andhra^Pradesh.

¶66

[OUT]

¶67

One CC to SRI. O. MANOHER REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

¶68

Three C.D.Copies

¶69

¶70

HIGH COURT DATED:07/11/2024

¶71

ORDER

¶72

WP.No.3009 of 2007

¶73

DISMISING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS

K.S.R. Anjaneyulu, Guntur District v. the District Educational Officer, Guntur & 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.S.R. Anjaneyulu, Guntur District v. the District Educational Officer, Guntur & 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Penumala Srikanth Vs I.v.Ramana, Addl. Asst. Egineer / Operation

M/S.Madanapalle Spinning Mills Limited, Chittoor Dist. Vs Ind.Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court, Ananthapur & Another

S. Ramana, Guntur District. Vs the Chairman Cum Managing Director, LIC of India, and 2

G.Veera Reddy Vs the Kadpa District Coop. Central Bank Ltd.

A.P. Forest Maistries Union, (Regd No. G.711/85) Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep by Principal