The court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous as the cause in lis did not survive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVAi;^2H5^o
o ■'y
(Special Original Jurisdiction) . ^ M .V 57
!'
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
'Ih
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR & • -S. . /.r
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 25518 OF 2006
Between:
A.P. Forest Maistries Union, (Regd No. G.711/85), Maredumilli, rep.by its General Secretary Sri A. Siva Prasada Rao, S/o Nookaraju aged 46 years R/o Gokaaram, East Godavari District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the Respondentauthorities in not issuing the final notification for revision of the Minimum Rates of Wages in the Employment of Forestry and Timbering operations as per the schedule after issuing the draft notification in G.O.Rt. No. 362, Labour,
Employment, Training & Factories (Lab.II) dated 3-3-2004 published in the Andhra Pradesh Gazett dated 2nd March, 2005 and not discharging their statutory duties under Section 5 of the Minimum Wages act, 1948 as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14, 19and21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents toissuefinalnotification as per Section 5 of the Minimum Wages Act for revisionofMinimumrates of Wages and to direct the respondents to pay the differentialamountsas per the minimum wages Act with interest at the rate of 18% per annum. I.A. NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP. NO: 32705 OF 2006)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the Fligh Court may be pleased to issue an interim direction directing the Respondents to issue final notification under Section 5 of the Minimum Wages act 1948 for revision of the wages in pursuance to the preliminarynotificationissued in G.O.Rt. No. 362, Labour, Employment, Training & Factories (Lab.II) dated 3rd march 2004 published in the Andhra Pradesh Gazette,dated2-3-2005 pending disposal of the WP.
Counsel for the Petltioner:SRI P V RAMANA
Counsel for the Respondents No.1,3: GP FOR LABOUR Counsel for the Respondents No.2,4: GP FOR FORESTS
The Court made the following: ORDER
APHC010020792006
[3504]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
( /
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 25518/2006
Between:
A.p. Forest Maistries Union, (regd No. G.711/85) ...PETITIONER
AND
The Government Of Andhra Pradesh Rep By Principal and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR LABOUR
2.GP FOR FORESTS
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
It is represented by Sri A.Kishore, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the lis does not survives and no further orders are required.
There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, allpending
applications shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/- U.SRI DEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR sectIoiN OFFICER
To,
•'V
HIGH COURT
DATED: 14/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.25518 of 2006
o o
m
HO^ 0 DEC 2C2’» Co
. Current Section .
DISMISING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
3 provisions across 3 enactments
A.P. Forest Maistries Union
The Government of Andhra Pradesh
The Conservator of Forests
The Commissioner of Labour, Government of, A.P.
The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests
Maheswara Rao Kuncheap
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
