Writ petition challenging an Industrial Tribunal award was listed for dismissal after repeated non-representation by petitioners; the High Court dismissed it for default with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
&sep
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 26650 OF 2006
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order direction or a writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of certiorari after calling for records from the Hon'ble Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Visakhapatnam and quash the Award in ID.No.104 of 2003 dated 01.08.2006.
j.A. NO: 1 OF 2006rWPMP. NO: 34239 OF 2006)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be
pleased to stay the operation of the Award passed bytheHon’bleLabour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Visakhapatnam and quash the Award in ID.No.104 of 2003 dated 01.08.2006.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K SRINIVASA MURTHY (NOT PRESENT) Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR LABOUR
Counsel for the Respondent No.2: MS. SWATHI GUDA REPRESENTING FOR SMT. M BHASKARA LAKSHMI
The Court made the following: ORDER
[3504]
APHC010049292006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 26650/2006
Between;
Hooghli Mills Projects Limited, 10 Clive Row.kolkataand Others
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
The Presiding Officer Industrial Tribunalcumlabourand Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.K SRINIVASA MURTHY
Counsel for the Respondent(S);
1.GP FOR LABOUR
2.M BHASKARA LAKSHMI
The Court made the following;
2
ORDER:-
no representation for the On 19.10.2024 & 26.10.2024, there was petitioners.
Dismissal’. 3. Today, the matter is listed under the caption ‘For For 4. Despite the fact that the matter is listed under thecaption Dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioners.
stand As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall
closed.
Sd/- A. VIJAYA BA3U assistant registrar //TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
TF
T
HIGH COURT
DATED:14/11/2024
ORDER
WP.No.26650 of 2006
[g 03 MAY 2025 O'
^ . Current section ^
DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR DEFAULT, WITHOUT COSTS
Hooghli Mills Projects Limited, 10 Clive Row, Kolkata
Hooghli Mills Projects Limited, Unit: East Coast Jute Mill, Cantonment Vizianagaram-3
The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Visakhapatnam
S. Suryanarayana Naidu
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
