Second appeal dismissed for default as appellants failed to pay directed costs and left counsel without instructions; miscellaneous petitions closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 878 OF 2006
Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C, against the Judgment and Decree dated 06-06-2006 passed in A.S No.221 of 2005 on the file of XI Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Guntur at Tenali, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 06-06-2005 passed in OS No.196 of 2003 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Tenali, Guntur District.
Between:
...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS
AND
Krothapalli Ramesh, S/o.Poornachandra Rao, aged about 49 years, R/o.Duggirala, Duggirala Mandal, Guntur District.
...RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT
Counsel for the Appellants:SRI VV L N SARMA (NO REPRESENTATION)
Counsel for the Respondent : SRI N SRIRAM MURTHY
The Court made the following ORDER :
r APHC010086342006
[3369]
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY JHE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 878/2006
Between:
Kollipakula Koteswara Guptha and Others
...APPELLANT(S)
[ Krothapalli Ramesh
AND
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1.VVL N SARMA
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.N SRIRAM MURTHY I
The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
- This Second Appeal was filed by the appellants/defendants under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 06.06.2006 passed inA.S.No.221of2005on the file of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Tract Court), Guntur at Tenali, reversing the judgment and decree, dated 06.06.2005 passed in O.S.No.196 of 2003 on the file of learnedAdditionalSeniorCivil Judge’s Court, Tenali.
- Despite being directed to pay costs of Rs.1000/- to the A.P. High Court Legal Services Committee, the appellants have yet to make the payment. However, the appellants' counsel requests further time for compliance.
w
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand
closed.
SD/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// /i^ SECTION OFFICER
To
HIGH COURT
DATED:10/12/2024
JUDGMENT
SA.No.878 of 2006
DISMISSING THE APPEAL FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kollipakula Koteswara Guptha
Kollipakula Hemamalini
Krothapalli Ramesh
T Mallikarjuna Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
