Dismissed
Pentapati Satyanarayana Murthy v. Pentapati Vijay Kumar
Andhra Pradesh HCAS/619/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
APPEAL SUIT NO: 619 OF 2014
Appeal filed under section 96 of C.P.C., against the judgment dated. 30/07/2014 passed in O.S.No. 25 of 2005 on the file of the court of the Principal District Judge, Vizianagaram.
Between:
Pentapati Satyanarayana Murthy, S/o. Late Rama Rao, Aged about 60 years, Hindu, R/o.D.No. 15-8-11 Viziangaram
...APPELLANT
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellant : SRI K V SUBRAHMANYA NARUSU
Counsel for the Respondents Nos. 1 to 4, 6 & 8 : SRIGVSMEHAR KUMAR
Counsel for other Respondents ; NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following JUDGMENT :
[3369]
APHC010409372014
0 MB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
APPEAL SUIT No: 619/2014
Between:
Pentapati Satyanarayana Murthy ...APPELLANT
AND
Pentapati Vijay Kumar and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) ■
Counsel for the Appellant:
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.G VS MEHAR KUMAR
2.A JAGANNADHA RAO
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT:
The Appeal Suit is preferred by the appellant against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.07.2014, passed in O.S.No.25 of 2005,onthe file of the
Principal District Judge, Vizianagaram.
- Ms.C.Aaswari, learned counsel representing Sri K.V.Subrahmanya Narusu, learned counsel for the appellant appeared through Video Conference. None appeared for the respondents.
- Learned counsel for the appellant submits that theyfiledaletter in the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the appeal.
- Despite listing the matter under the caption ‘For Withdrawal’, none appeared for the respondents.
Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall standvacated.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand
closed.
SD/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
/ SECTION OFFICER
To,
- One CC to Sri. G V S Mehar Kumar Advocate [OPUC]
- Three CD Copies
SAM TAC
HIGH COURT
DATED:09/12/2024
JUDGMENT
AS.No.619 of 2014
AND«^
£P
2 3 DEC 7^ m
O Oi
. Curran, jwuit&n ^
DISMISSING THIS APPEAL SUIT AS WITHDRAWN
Pentapati Satyanarayana Murthy
Pentapati Vijay Kumar and Others
T Mallikarjuna Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court