The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the second appeal No. 1420 of 2008 for default. The appellant failed to appear in the morning and afternoon sessions, evincing no interest to proceed with the appeal.
Second Appeal dismissed for default without adjudication on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 1420 OF 2008
Appeal filed under Section 100 of G.P.C, against the Judgment and Decree dated 12-09-2008 passed in A.S No. 184 of 2005 on the file of Principal District Judge, Guntur, confirming the Judgmentand Decree dated 01-04-2005 passed in OS No.986 of 2004 on the file of the II Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, Guntur District.
Between:
S.V.S.Traders, rep by its Proprietor Sadhu Venkat Subbaiah S/o.Narsimharao, aged 41 years, Hindu, Business, O/o.D.No.5-170 Koppula Street, Nellore.
...APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT AND
p by Manaing Director K.Mohan Reddy, Rep by its Power of Attorney G.Ravi Kumar Kallam Agro Products (P) Ltd., 0/o.Dogiparu, Medikonduru Mandal, Guntur District.
...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF
Counsel for the Appellant ;SRI THRIVENI CHITTAMUR
(NO REPRESENTATION)
Counsel for the Respondent : SRI T LAKSHMI NARAYANA The Court made the following JUDGMENT :
w
9^^
APHC010208392008
■■V
4 ■-
i
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3369]
MONDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 1420/2008
Between:
S.v.s.traders
...APPELLANT
I
AND
M/s Kallam Agro Products P Limited
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.THRIVENI CHITTAMURU
Counsel for the Respondent:
1.T LAKSHMI NARAYANA
The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
- This Second Appeal was filed by the appellant/defendantunderSection 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 12.09.2008 passed in A.S.No.184of2005onthe file of learned Principal District Judge’s Court, Guntur, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 01.04.2005 passed in O.S.No.986of2004onthe file of learned II Additional Junior Civil Judge’sCourt,Guntur.
- Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in themorningsession, no representation on behalf of the appellant. Learned counsel for the respondent present and reports his urgency. The matterwassubsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M.
w
- Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand
closed.
SDI- M.RAMESH BABU
DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
segChon officer
To
HIGH COURT
i
DATED;09/12/2024
JUDGMENT
SA.No.1420 of 2008
col
[x 27 MAR 2025
. Current iiection
DISMISSING THE APPEAL FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the second appeal against a decree passed in original suit.
S.V.S.Traders (rep by Proprietor Sadhu Venkat Subbaiah S/o.Narsimharao)
Kallam Agro Products (P) Ltd. (rep by Prop of Manaing Director K.Mohan Reddy)
T. Mallikarjuna Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
