The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed a second appeal filed by the appellant for default as counsel did not appear representation, despite multiple listings and a condition of payment of costs. The judgment recorded that the appellant had no interest in proceeding and declared the matter closed without assigning costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAT^
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
^ ilif >
X
yjy.
P..
oi
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 85 OF 2010
Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C, against theJudgmentand Decree dated 22-10-2009 passed in A.S No.222 of 2008onthe file of District Judge, Guntur, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 26-06-2008 passed in OS No.57 of 2001 on the file ofthe II Additional Senior Civil Judge (Fast Track Court), Guntur, GunturDistrict. Between: Ramineni Sivaramaiah Chowdary, S/o.Venkata Rao, aged about 65 years, Occu:Business, R/o.Flat No. 105, Srinivasa Towers, # 3/1, Ashoknagar, Guntur.
...APPELLANT/APPELLANT
AND
Manne Ravichandra, S/o.Ravindra, aged about 48 years, Occu:Civit Contractor, R/o.Flat No.301, Anitha Apratments, Lakshmipuram, Guntur.
...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant : SRI CH PUSHYAM KIRAN (NO REPRESENTATION)
Counsel for the Respondent : SRI RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM
The Court made the following JUDGMENT ;
y.
I t APHC010507902010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3369]
TUESDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 85/2010
Between:
Ramineni Sivaramaiah Chowdary ...APPELLANT AND Manne Ravrnchandra ...RESPONDENT
Manne Ravrnchandra
Counsel for the Appellant:
1.CH PUSHYAM KIRAN
Counsel for the Respondent:
The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
- This Second Appeal was filed by the appellant/defendant under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 22.10.2009 passe'd in A.S.No.222 of 2008 on the file of learned Distirct Judge’s Court, Guntur, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 26.06.2008 passed in O.S.No.57 of 2001 on the file of learned II Additional Senior Civil Judge (Fast Track Court), Guntur. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, no representation on behalf of the appellant. Learned counsel for the respondent present. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand
closed.
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- V.DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR S TCER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED: 10/12/2024
JUDGMENT
SA.No.85 of 2010
^ 'I
2'» MAR 2025
^ . Current Section ^
DISMISSING THE APPEAL FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS
Ramineni Sivaramaiah Chowdary
Manne Ravichandra
T. Mallikarjuna Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
