Second appeal against a first appellate decree reversing the trial court's judgment. Counsel for the appellant could not obtain instructions from his party and no one appeared for the respondents. The High Court dismissed the second appeal for default, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AMARAVATI
MONDAY ,THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 903 OF 2008
Appeal under sectionlOO of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree dt15/04/2008 in A.S.No 239 of 2005 on the file of the Court of the VII Addl. District & Sessions Judge (FTC) Vijayawada
Between:
Garre Kondala Rao,, S/o. Lte Rama Swamy, R/o. Nagothivari Veedhi, Kothapet, Vijayawada.
...APPELLANT
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Appellant(s):SRI. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY
Counsel for the RespondentsiSRI. CH RAVINDER
The Court made the followingiORDER
«
APHC010215512008
TOW
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3369]
MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO: 903/2008
Between:
Garre Kondala Rao,
...APPELLANT
AND
Garre Satyanarayana Died and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Appellant:
TSAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.CH RAVINDER
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT:
The Second Appeal is preferred by the appellant against the Judgment and Decree dated 15.04.2008, passed in A.S.No.239 of2005,onthefileof the learned VII Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court) at Vijayawada, reversing the Decree and Judgment dated 16.03.2005 in O.S.No.1770 of 2000 on the file of the I Additional Junior Judge at Vijayawada.
- Learned counsel for the appellant is present. None appeared for the respondent.
that inspite of their best 3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits could not get instructions from their party. efforts, they
, this Court is of the view and circumstances of the case 4. In the said facts this Court could not from both the parties that without proper representation proceed further.
dismissed for default. There shall be 5, Accordingly, the Second Appeal is no order as to costs,
interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated, in this appeal shall stand Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any
closed.
Sd/-K. TATA RAO deputy registrar
//true copy//
To,
(FTC), Vijayawada (with records) 1. The Vll Addl District & Sessions Judge ior Civil Judge, Vijayawada 2 The Addl Junior
of Andhra Pradesh at Atnaravati VR Section, High Court 5. The Section Officer
6. Three CD Copies
ns
T
HIGH COURT
DATED:09/12/2024
ORDER
SA.No.903 of 2008
#
2 0 JAN 2025
:\0
Current Section
S.A IS DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Garre Kondala Rao
Garre Satyanarayana (died)
Garre Bhaskara Babu
T Mallikarjuna Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
