Civil case dismissed as infructuous after parties settled out of court. No substantive adjudication required.
Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous; pending applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.1624 of 2014
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed under Sec.482 Cr.P.C., by the Petitioner, seeking to call for the records pertaining to and connected with Criminal Revision Petition No.50 of 2012 on the file of the Court of XIII Additional District Judge, Narasaraopet, Guntur District in dismissing the case by modifying the order passed by learned I Additional Junior Civil Judge, Gurazala in MC No.3 of 2010 in so far as the respondent No.2 is concerned and quash the same.
At the time of hearing, learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the matter is settled between the parties out of the Court and no orders are necessary and became infructuous.
In view of the said submissions, nothing survives in this criminal petition for adjudication.
Therefore, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
JUSTICE DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANA
26.09.2022 Mjl/*
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANA
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 1624 OF 2014
(Dismissed as Infructuous)
26.09.2022
Mjl/*
Petitioner
Respondent No.2
Duppala Venkata RamaNa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
