This order dismissed a Criminal Petition under S. 482 Cr.P.C. as infructuous because the petitioner had already been discharged by the Sessions Court while the petition remained inactive.
Criminal Petition dismissed as infructuous; pending applications closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANA CRIMINAL PETITION No. 13884 of 2016
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed under Sec.482 Cr.P.C., by the Petitioner/A-5, seeking to quash the proceedings in CC No.436 of 2015 on the file of the Court of III Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 290 and 188 read with Section 149, against her.
None were appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
At the time of hearing, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No.1-State submitted that the case was transferred to the Court of III Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada and numbered as CC No.938 of 2016 on 07.12.2016 and later the petitioner was discharged under Section 258 Cr.P.C. and filed a memo to that effect and no orders are necessary and became infructuous.
In view of the said submissions, nothing survives in this criminal petition for adjudication. Therefore, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
JUSTICE DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANA
26.09.2022 Mjl/*
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DUPPALA VENKATA RAMANA
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 13884 OF 2016
(Dismissed as Infructuous)
26.09.2022
Mjl/*
1 issue framed by the court
Whether proceedings pending in Sessions Court require quashing by this Court after discharge under S. 258 Cr.P.C.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner/A-5
State
Duppala Venkata Ramana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
