Disposed¶13

Reema Maurya v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Allahabad HC5 May 2026NA529/2220/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Expedition of trial; application under S. 529 BNSS; expeditious disposal of complaint case under S. 12 D.V. Act (Complaint Case No. 44893 of 2022, Reema Maurya Vs. Rahul Maurya) pending since 2022 at Gorakhpur; six-month timeline from production of certified copy; no legal impediment condition; bar on unnecessary adjournments; no notice to opposite party Nos. 2 to 7; innocuous order; Prashant Mishra-I, J.; decided May 5, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the trial court to decide Complaint Case No. 44893 of 2022 expeditiously, if possible within six months from the date of production of certified copy of the order, if there is no legal impediment, without permitting unnecessary adjournments to either party; application disposed of without notice to opposite party Nos. 2 to 7. ¶13

Reema Maurya vs State of U.P. and 6 Others — Domestic Violence | Allahabad HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶13

Issue for consideration

Whether the trial court should be directed to decide Complaint Case No. 44893 of 2022 (Reema Maurya Vs. Rahul Maurya), under Section 12 D.V. Act, pending since 2022, expeditiously within a stipulated period. +1 more

¶6

Court's answer

The learned trial court concerned shall make all endeavour to decide the case expeditiously, if possible within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of the order.

¶9

Ratio / Principle

The expedition direction is subject to there being no legal impediment, and the trial court shall not permit unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties.

¶12

Key takeaways

The application is disposed of without issuing any notice to opposite party Nos. 2 to 7, the order being innocuous; if they feel aggrieved, they may approach this Court.ratio¶13

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Prashant Mishra-I, J.) disposed of an application under Section 529 BNSS by Reema Maurya seeking expeditious disposal of Complaint Case No. 44893 of 2022 (Reema Maurya Vs. Rahul Maurya) under Section 12 D.V. Act, Police Station Pripraich, District Gorakhpur, pending since 2022 before the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court No. 14/J.M., Gorakhpur. The learned A.G.A. had no objection to expedition. Directing the trial court to make all endeavour to decide the case expeditiously, if possible within six months from the date of production of certified copy of the order, if there is no legal impediment, and without permitting unnecessary adjournments to either party, the Court disposed of the application without issuing notice to opposite party Nos. 2 to 7, terming the order innocuous and leaving them liberty to approach the Court if aggrieved.

Reema Maurya v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Reema Maurya v. State of U.P. and 6 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt Arti Anand Vs State of U.P. and Another

Atiullah Khan Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ramnayan Vs State of U.P. and Another

Deepika Rao Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Abhishek Sharma vs State of U.P. and Another

Guudi Kinnar Devi vs State of U.P. and 2 Others