Ramnayan Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Ramnayan Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Direction to the learned trial court to decide the case expeditiously, preferably within three months from production of a certified copy of the order, without unnecessary adjournments; application disposed of without notice to opposite party No. 2, with liberty to that party to approach the Court if aggrieved.

Issue for consideration

Whether the pending Criminal Misc. Appeal No. 41 of 2025 (arising from Case Crime No. 101 of 2023) should be directed to be decided expeditiously within a stipulated time.

Ratio / Principle

The learned trial court concerned shall make all endeavour to decide the case expeditiously, preferably within three months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order, if there is no legal impediment, without permitting unnecessary adjournments to either party.

Key takeaways

The application is disposed of without issuing any notice to opposite party No. 2, the order being innocuous; opposite party No. 2 may approach the Court if aggrieved.ratio¶14

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Prashant Mishra-I, J.), by order dated May 5, 2026, disposed of an application under S. 529 BNSS (No. 2229 of 2026) filed by Ramnayan seeking expeditious disposal of Criminal Misc. Appeal No. 41 of 2025 (Ramnayan Vs. State of U.P. and another), arising out of Case Crime No. 101 of 2023 under Sections 34, 302, 307, 504, 506, 201, 120B I.P.C., Police Station Dohrighat, District Mau, stated to be pending in the court of Special Judge, POCSO Court No. 1, District Mau; learned counsel submitted the appeal was of the year 2024 and undecided, and learned A.G.A. raised no objection to expedition. The Court directed the learned trial court concerned to make all endeavour to decide the case expeditiously, preferably within three months from the date of production of a certified copy of the order, if there is no legal impediment, and without permitting unnecessary adjournments to either party. The application was disposed of without issuing notice to opposite party No. 2 as an innocuous order, with liberty to that party to approach the Court if aggrieved.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2229 of 2026

Ramnayan

Versus	.....Applicant(s)
State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Vijay Pratap Yadav
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

Court No. - 84

HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. representing the State and perused the record.

The instant application has been preferred by the applicant with a prayer for expeditious disposal of Criminal Misc. Appeal No. 41 of 2025 (Ramnayan Vs. State of U.P. and another), in Case Crime No. 101 of 2023, under Sections 34, 302, 307, 504, 506, 201, 120B I.P.C., Police Station Dohrighat, District Mau, pending in the court of Special Judge, POCSO Court No. 1, District Mau, within stipulated time.

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the aforesaid appeal is of the year 2024 and the same has not been decided yet.

Learned A.G.A. has no objection if the matter be expedited in the interest of justice.

In view of the above, it is directed that the learned trial court concerned shall make all endeavour to decide the case expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment, without permitting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties.

NA529 No. 2229 of 2026

2

With the aforesaid direction, this application is disposed of without issuing any notice to opposite party No. 2 as it is an innocuous order. If opposite party No. 2 feels aggrieved, he may approach this Court.

(Prashant Mishra-I,J.)

May 5, 2026

Kashifa

Digitally signed by :- KASHIFA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad