Disposed¶13

Smt Arti Anand v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC5 May 2026NA529/2232/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Expeditious disposal direction; Section 529 BNSS application; Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance complaint (Complaint Case No. 139 of 2024, Arti Anand Vs. Ravindra Kumar); Family Court-2, Ghaziabad; six-month timeline from certified copy; no undue adjournments; disposed without notice to O.P. No. 2 as innocuous order; Allahabad High Court, May 5, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the court below (Additional Principal Judge, Family Court-2, Ghaziabad) to decide Complaint Case No. 139 of 2024 expeditiously, preferably within six months from the date of production of certified copy of the order, without permitting undue adjournments to either side. ¶13

Smt Arti Anand vs State of U.P. and Another — Maintenance and Alimony | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2232 of 2026

¶3

Versus Smt Arti Anand	.....Applicant(s)
State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) :	Ashvani Kumar Tiwari
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :	G.A.

¶4

Court No. - 84

¶5

HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J.

¶6

Heard Sri Ankit Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ashvani Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that learned trial court be directed to dispose of the Complaint Case No. 139 of 2024, (Arti Anand Vs. Ravindra Kumar) under Section 125 Cr.P.C., P.S. Vijay Nagar, District Ghaziabad pending in the Court of learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court-2, Ghaziabad within stipulated time.

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection if the matter be expedited in the interest of justice.

¶9

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that present case is pending since 2024, more than one and half years have passed and case has not culminated to its logical conclusion.

¶10

Keeping in view the period of pendency of the case, it is directed that court below shall make all endeavour to decide this case expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal hurdle, without permitting undue adjournments to either sides.

¶11

NA529 No. 2232 of 2026

¶12

¶13

With this direction, this application is disposed of without issuing any notice to O.P. No. 2 as it is an innocuous order. If the O.P. No.2 feels aggrieved, he/she may approach this Court.

¶14

May 5, 2026

¶15

A. Mandhani

¶16

(Prashant Mishra-I,J.)

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK MANDHANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt Arti Anand v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Arti Anand v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt Arti Anand Vs State of U.P. and Another

Atiullah Khan Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ramnayan Vs State of U.P. and Another

Deepika Rao Vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Abhishek Sharma vs State of U.P. and Another

Guudi Kinnar Devi vs State of U.P. and 2 Others