Allowed

Usha Chaudhary v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Lko.

Allahabad HC17 Oct 2024BAIL/6196/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under Sections 420, 406, 506, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC for offences at Hasanganj police station, Lucknow. Following a successful mediation with settlement except payment timeline, the court accepted the applicant's proposal to pay the disputed amount within eight months and made interim bail absolute, allowing the application without additional surety.

What the court decided

AI extract

Usha Chaudhary vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy… — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2024)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:73310

¶2

Court No. - 7

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6196 of 2024

¶4

Applicant :- Usha Chaudhary Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Gauri Suwan Pandey,Aman Singh Bhadoriya,Jitendra Vikram,Manish Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Vivek Srivastava

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Vivek Srivastava, learned counsel for the complainant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶7

The instant application has been filed seeking bail of the applicant in Crime No.01 of 2022, under Sections 420, 406, 506, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., Police Station Hasanganj, District Lucknow.

¶8

In terms of the order passed by this Court dated 24.9.2004, the parties were for mediation. Subsequently, vide order dated 24.10.2024, the applicant was enlarged on interim bail.

¶9

it is argued by learned counsel for both the parties that the mediation has been successful and a report to this effect dated 4.11.2024 has been submitted to this Court.

¶10

In terms of the mediation centre report dated 4.11.2024, the parties have amicably settled their disputes except clause-B of paragraph 6 of the settlement deed. The time for payment in respect of amount specified in paragraph 6-B has been left to the discretion of the High Court.

¶11

Learned counsel for the applicant states that the said amount shall be paid within eight months from today. The said proposal is acceptable to learned counsel for the respondent.

¶12

In view thereof, interim bail granted to the applicant is made absolute. No further surety is required by the applicant apart from the sureties indicated in the order dated 24.10.2024. The

¶13

parties shall agree and abide themselves to the settlement as agreed in between the parties.

¶14

The bail application stands allowed in terms of above.

¶15

Order Date :- 6.11.2024

¶16

Shukla

¶17

Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Usha Chaudhary v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Usha Chaudhary v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Qadeer Ahmad @ Qadeer Ahmad Siddiqui and Others Vs Shakeel Ahmad and Others

Digant Kumar Khandelwal and 3 Others Vs Sachin Khandelwal and 6 Others

Suraj @ Viprendra Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Brijesh Kumar Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. and Ors.

Mrityunjai Singh Shiv Ji Thru. His Natural Guardain Father Sri Shashank Shekhar Singh Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Sports and 4 Others

Rabind Vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Another