Digant Kumar Khandelwal and 3 Others v. Sachin Khandelwal and 6 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 227 on the ground that it had become infructuous by the passage of time.
The Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 227 on the ground that it had become infructuous by the passage of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2024:AHC-LKO:69734
Court No. - 7
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3194 of 2024
Petitioner :- Digant Kumar Khandelwal And 3 Others Respondent :- Sachin Khandelwal And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sharad Pathak,Anamika Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Ankit Srivastava
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1 . The Counsel for the petitioner states that the matter has become infructuous by passage of time.
2 . Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 16.10.2024 akverma
Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Digant Kumar Khandelwal And 3 Others
Sachin Khandelwal And 6 Others
Pankaj Bhatia
Ashok Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court