Petitioner challenged non-payment of compensation for excess land taken for NH 29 construction. Respondents undertook to demarcate and pay compensation within two months. Writ petition disposed accordingly.
No relief granted; petition disposed as respondents undertook action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 351
Chief Justice's Court
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25129 of 2018
Petitioner :- Abdul Rahman Respondent :- State Of U.P. and others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Mr. Santosh Kumar Singh, Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- Mr. Hare Ram, Standing Counsel for respondents no.1 and 2, Mr. Pranjal Mehrotra, Advocate for respondents no.3 and 4
Hon'ble Rajesh Bindal,Chief Justice Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Date :- 6.1.2022 Manish Himwan/P.Sri
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant relief regarding non-payment of compensation for excess land taken during highway construction.
Whether the petition should be disposed of in light of respondents' undertaking on demarcation and compensation.
Abdul Rahman
State Of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
