The petitioner claimed possession of excess land was taken without compensation during NH-2 construction. The court disposed of the writ petition based on the respondents' undertaking to demarcate the land and pay due compensation.
Writ petition disposed of on the undertaking to demarcate land and pay compensation within specified timelines.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Chief Justice's Court Serial No. 351
**HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD *****
WRIT - C No. - 14831 of 2017
Usman Ali Through :- Mr. Mukesh Chandra Gupta, Advocate
.....Petitioner
v/s
State of U.P. and others
.....Respondent
Through :- Mr. Hare Ram, Standing Counsel for respondents no. 1, 3, 4 and 5, Mr. Pranjal Mehrotra, Advocate for respondent no. 2
CORAM : HON'BLE RAJESH BINDAL, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
2 WRIC No. 14831 of 2017
writ petition may be disposed of in terms thereof.
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Allahabad 06.01.2022 P.Sri./MH
Whether the order is speaking : Yes/No Whether the order is reportable : Yes/No
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition regarding possession of excess acquired land without compensation may be disposed of on the basis of the respondents' undertaking.
Usman Ali
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
