Petitioner in PIL sought permission to withdraw petition with liberty to file a fresh petition with better particulars, which the court granted.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No.17
Chief Justice's Court
Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2451 of 2021
Petitioner :- Yogendra Yadav Respondent :- State of U.P. and others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh, Advocate appearing for Mr. Kamlesh Shrama, Advocate Counsel for Respondent :- Mr. Rajiv Singh, Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 5
Hon'ble Rajesh Bindal,Chief Justice Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file fresh one for the same relief giving better particulars.
Ordered accordingly.
Date :- 5.1.2022 Kuldeep/AHA
(Piyush Agrawal, J.) (Rajesh Bindal, C.J.)
Yogendra Yadav
State of U.P.
Rajesh Bindal
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
