In a rehearing (2021) of a 2013 writ petition, the single judge dismissed the petition held unnecessary under Article 226 as the Railway Claims Tribunal order required no interference.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24876 of 2013
Petitioner :- Smt. Bhagwan Devi Baghel Respondent :- Union Of India Thru Secy. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Raj Narayan Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- Govind Saran,Rama Shanker Yadav
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
List revised.
No one is present on behalf of either of the parties to press the writ petition.
This writ petition is of the year 2013.
From perusal of the material on record, it appears that the order passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal needs no interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Writ petition is dismissed, accordingly.
Order Date :- 12.11.2021 Shekhar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order of Railway Claims Tribunal needs interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Smt. Bhagwan Devi Baghel
Union Of India
Thru Secy. And 2 Others
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
