Single-bench writ petition filed to quash a recovery citation. Dismissed as infructuous because the citation was executed and no interim order was granted during the pendency of the petition.
Petition dismissed as infructuous due to execution of recovery citation without interim order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1932 of 2019
Petitioner :- Buddhsen Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sudhir Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sanjai Singh
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
List revised.
No one is present on behalf of petitioner to press the writ petition, however, Sri Sanjai Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent bank is present.
This writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of the recovery citation dated 02.11.2018.
As the matter is of the year 2018, it appears that recovery citation has been executed and till date no interim order has been granted by this Court.
In view of the said fact, writ petition has become infructuous and same is hereby dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 11.11.2021 Shekhar
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Buddhsen
State Of U.P.
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
