Writ petition challenging a demand notice issued by a bank is not maintainable since no writ lies against a demand notice. The petition was dismissed as not maintainable without a hearing due to the absence of both parties on the designated date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 1936 of 2019
Petitioner :- Mohan Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mukti Nath Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Nimai Dass
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
List revised.
No one is present on behalf of either side to press the writ petition.
This writ petition has been filed challenging the demand notice dated 16.08.2018 issued by the respondent no. 3 bank.
As no writ petition lies against a demand notice, writ petition is dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 11.11.2021 Shekhar
Mohan Singh
State Of U.P.
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3 Bank
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
