A writ petition challenging an order on recounting was dismissed as infructuous because the term of the Pradhan had ended by 2015 and subsequent elections were held in 2021.
Petition dismissed as infructuous due to expiry of Pradhan's term and subsequent elections held in 2021.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 24101 of 2013
Petitioner :- Rajeev Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- A.K. Singh Kashtahariya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
List revised. No one is present on behalf of petitioner to press this writ petition.
Sri Jitendra Pal Singh, learned Standing Counsel states that the order under challenge in the writ petition is order of recounting passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate/ Prescribed Authority on 03.04.2013.
As the term of Pradhan had already come to an end in the year 2015 and subsequent elections were held in the year 2021, this writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of said fact, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 12.11.2021 V.S.Singh
Rajeev
The State Of U.P.
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
