Ram Devi v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner's counsel stated the writ petition had become infructuous. The bench dismissed the petition on these grounds without engaging in substantive analysis.
Petitioner's counsel stated the writ petition had become infructuous. The bench dismissed the petition on these grounds without engaging in substantive analysis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 648 of 2020
Petitioner :- Ram Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Kushwaha Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sanjai Singh
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Sri Vinod Kumar Kushwaha, learned counsel for petitioner states that writ petition has become infructuous.
In view of statement so made, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 11.11.2021 V.S.Singh
Ram Devi
State Of U.P.
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court