Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J. perused the record in Criminal Revision No. 633 of 1987 where no one appeared to press the case. The court found no manifest error or illegality to justify interference in the judgment dismissing the appeal against conviction under Section 7/16 IPC.
Revision dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 633 of 1987
Revisionist :- Bhola Shanker Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Revisionist :- V.P. Srivastava,Akhilesh Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 23.10.2019 AK
2 issues framed by the court
Whether any manifest error or illegality warrants interference in the criminal revision.
Whether the conviction and sentence under Sections 7/16 IPC should be disturbed.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Bhola Shanker
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
