In Criminal Revision No. 2072 of 1986, the High Court held that no manifest error or illegality existed in the conviction and sentence of two years rigorous imprisonment under Sections 376 and 394 IPC. Dismissed the revision.
Revision dismissed; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2072 of 1986
Revisionist :- G. And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Apul Mishra,Neeraj Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 23.10.2019 AK
2 issues framed by the court
Whether there is any manifest error or illegality, procedural or otherwise, in the lower Court's judgment to justify interference in a criminal revision regarding sentence under Sections 376 IPC and 3
Whether the sentence of two years rigorous imprisonment under Section 376 IPC warrants interference in criminal revision.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
G. And Others
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
