In a calls for record order, the High Court characterized the writ petition as infructuous due to the absence of the petitioner and the non-survival of the cause of action, and dismissed it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20117 of 2003
Petitioner :- Ajit Kumar And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Someshwari Prasad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
is why, counsel for petitioners is absent.
Order Date :- 22.10.2019 AK
Ajit Kumar And Others
State Of U.P. And Others
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
