The High Court dismissed a writ petition called under Section 115 of the CPC because no counsel appeared for the petitioner, finding the cause of action likely no longer survived.
The writ petition was dismissed and the interim order, if any, was vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 18368 of 2002
Petitioner :- Cooperative Society Employees Union Through Akshay Kumar Rai Respondent :- Registrar Cooperative Societies U.P Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- A.K. Malviya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 22.10.2019 AK
Cooperative Society Employees Union Through Akshay Kumar Rai
Registrar Cooperative Societies U.P Lucknow
Others
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
