This criminal revision regarding an acquittal under S.C./S.T. Act laws was filed but no party appeared. The bench perused the record and held no manifest error or illegity existed, leading to dismissal of the revision.
No crosstabulation, if any, stands vacated and the revision is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2176 of 1999
Revisionist :- Sanjay Kumar Opposite Party :- Bal Ram Singh And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Vishnu Gupta,Puneet Bhadauria,R.O.V.S. Chauhan Counsel for Opposite Party :- P. Dixit,U.C. Mishra
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order acquitting the respondents warranted interference under Section 401 Cr.P.C.
Whether any manifest error or illegality exists in the acquittal judgment.
4 provisions across 3 enactments
Sanjay Kumar
Bal Ram Singh
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
