Honnble Sudhir Agarwal, J. disposed of Criminal Revision No. 1334 of 1989. The revisionist filed a revision under Sections 397/401 Cr.P.C. against conviction and sentence under Sections 7/16 Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. The Single Judge found no manifest error or illegality and dismissed the revision.
Revision dismissed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1334 of 1989
Revisionist :- Dullah Khan Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- A.K. Goyal Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there was any manifest error or illegality in the impugned judgment and order to justify interference.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Dullah Khan
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
