Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J. dismissed the criminal revision under Sections 401 and 397 Cr.P.C. filed by Jagdish Singh against the acquittal of accused persons, finding no manifest error or illegality in the Sessions Judge's order. The parties did not appear to press the revision.
Criminal revision dismissed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 176 of 1994
Revisionist :- Jagdish Singh Opposite Party :- Durbeen Singh And Other Counsel for Revisionist :- Anup Ghosh Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.,Mohd. Farooq
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether any manifest error or illegality, procedural or otherwise, exists to justify interference in the criminal revision.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jagdish Singh
Durbeen Singh And Other
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
