In this criminal revision under Section 401 read with Section 397 Cr.P.C., the Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal, J. perused the record as none appeared. Finding no manifest error or illegality, the court dismissed the revision filed by Har Prasad against the conviction under Sections 323, 324, 325 IPC.
Revision dismissed; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 980 of 1987
Revisionist :- Har Prasad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- D.K. Singh,Radhika Srivastava,Rama Shanker Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 3.7.2019 KA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned judgment and order should be interfered with under Section 401 read with Section 397 Cr.P.C.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Har Prasad
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
