The High Court, in a special leave to edit the judgment, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the defence against the acquittal of accused persons in a murder case.
Criminal revision No. 766 of 1989 dismissed; impugned order of acquittal affirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 766 of 1989
Revisionist :- Pyarey Lal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- A.K. Jaiswal Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.,I.H.Khan,J.H.Khan
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether any manifest error, procedural or otherwise, existed in the lower court's judgment acquitting the opposite parties.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pyarey Lal
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
