Dismissed
Sharda v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCCRLR/470/1990
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Held that the record did not show any manifest error or illegality, procedural or otherwise, to warrant interference in the criminal revision.
What did the court decide?
The criminal revision was dismissed; interim order, if any, was vacated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 34
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 470 of 1990
¶3
Revisionist :- Sharda Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- J.S. Sanger Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.
¶4
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
¶5
- Called in revise. None appeared to press this revision. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
¶6
- This criminal revision under Section 401 read with Section 397 Cr.P.C. has been filed aggrieved by judgment and order dated 6.3.1990 passed Sri B.N.Shukla, Special/Additional Sessions Judge, Ghazipur affirming conviction of appellant for the offence under Section 7/16 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and modifying sentence to six months rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default to pay fine, to undergo one months' additional rigorous imprisonment.
¶7
- Having gone through the record, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality, procedural or otherwise, so as to justify interference in criminal revision.
¶8
- Dismissed.
¶9
- Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Sharda
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
AI extract
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/470/1990
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court