Boodh Singh v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The single-judge bench dismissed the criminal revision as there was no manifest error or illegality in the impugned judgment. The revisionist was directed to be arrested.
What did the court decide?
Revision dismissed; bail bonds cancelled; revisionist directed to be arrested.
What the court decided
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1809 of 1987
Revisionist :- Boodh Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Tapan Ghosh,S.S.Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
- Called in revise. None appeared to press this revision. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
- This criminal revision under Section 401 read with Section 397 Cr.P.C. has been filed aggrieved by judgment and order dated 18.11.1987 passed by 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Meerut in Criminal Appeal No. 148 of 1986 dismissing the appeal and confirming the judgment and order dated 23.10.1986 passed by 1st Assistant Sessions Judge, Meerut convicting and sentencing the revisionist under Section 307 I.P.C. and 25 Arms Act.
- Having gone through the record, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality, procedural or otherwise, so as to justify interference in criminal revision.
- Dismissed.
- The revisionist Boodh Singh is on bail. His bail bonds and surety bonds are cancelled. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut shall cause him to be arrested and lodged in jail to serve out the sentence passed against him. The compliance shall be reported within two months.
Coram
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/1809/1987
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court