Dismissed
Laxman Dom v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCBAIL/41730/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The single judge rejected a bail application moved by an accused facing charges of culpable homicide under Section 304 IPC. The court found no fit case for bail.
What did the court decide?
Bail application of the applicant is rejected.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 34
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41730 of 2016
¶3
Applicant :- Laxman Dom Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Kedar Nath Mishra,Kamlesh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
¶4
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
¶5
- Heard Sri Kamlesh Singh, learned counsel for applicant, learned AGA for State and perused the material available on record.
¶6
- The present bail application has been moved by accusedapplicant for enlarging him on bail in Case Crime No. 77 of 2016, under Section 304 I.P.C., Police Station Mail, District Deoria.
¶7
- Applicant is named in FIR. Informant has supported FIR version and cause of death as shown in postmortem report is also consistent with FIR version.
¶8
- Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, I do not find it a fit case where applicant should be enlarged on bail.
¶9
- In view of above, bail application of applicant is rejected. Order Date :- 4.7.2019 Siddhant Sahu
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
AI extract
Whether the applicant should be enlarged on bail in a case involving culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Laxman Dom
Coram
AI extract
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/41730/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court