Dismissed
Tej Pal v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCCRLR/157/1998
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Criminal Revision Court dismissed the revision filed by Tej Pal, finding no manifest error or illegality in the impugned order confirming the sentence in a food adulteration case.
What did the court decide?
Interim order, if any, stands vacated. This judgment is certified to the lower Court.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 34
¶2
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 157 of 1998
¶3
Revisionist :- Tej Pal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Brijendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
¶4
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
¶5
- Called in revise. None appeared to press this revision. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
¶6
- This criminal revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C., has been filed aggrieved by judgement and order dated 12.12.1997 passed by learned Ist Additional District Judge, Aligarh in Criminal Appeal No. 36 of 1995 dismissing appeal and confirming sentence awarded by Sri S.D. Paliwal, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hathras vide judgement and order dated 24.08.1995, in Complaint Case No. 1247 of 1991, under Section 7/16 of U.P. Prevention of Food Adulteration Act. Being aggrieved, accused preferred present revision.
¶7
- Having gone through the record, I do not find any manifest error or otherwise illegality, procedural or otherwise, so as to justify interference in criminal revision.
¶8
- Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
¶9
- Certify this judgment to the lower Court immediately.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Tej Pal
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
AI extract
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/157/1998
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court