Dismissed
Udai v. Sampati and Another
Allahabad HCSAPL/3292/1981
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Second Appeal No. 3292 of 1981 heard as called in revise. No appearance by appellant. Dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim order vacated.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Court No. - 34
¶2
Case :- SECOND APPEAL No. - 3292 of 1981
¶3
Appellant :- Udai Respondent :- Sampati And Another Counsel for Appellant :- H.P. Tripathi,A.B. Maurya,V. Singh Counsel for Respondent :- R.H. Srivastava,B.R. Singh,Davesh Pandey,Devendra Kumar,Narendra Mohan,S.R. Singh
¶4
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
¶5
- Called in revise. None appeared to press this appeal.
¶6
- Dismissed for want of prosecution.
¶7
- Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
¶8
- Sri Sukesh Kumar, Advocate, is present for respondents. Order Date :- 18.10.2019 Ashish Pd.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Udai
- respondent
Sampati
Coram
AI extract
Sudhir Agarwal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAPL/3292/1981
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court