The High Court dismissed a writ petition called on for revision in the absence of the petitioner's counsel, holding the matter infructuous or unsustainable.
The writ petition was dismissed; interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 29708 of 2004
Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Yadav And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
is why, counsel for petitioners is absent.
Order Date :- 18.10.2019 AK
Manoj Kumar Yadav And Others
State Of U.P. And Others
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
