In this criminal revision, the High Court perused the record as no one appeared to press the matter. Finding no manifest error or illegality, the court dismissed the revision against convictions under Sections 323, 324, and 504 IPC.
Criminal revision dismissed. Earlier conviction and sentence under Sections 323, 324, and 504 IPC confirmed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1343 of 1998
Revisionist :- Phootey And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- R.K. Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
Order Date :- 17.10.2019 AK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Criminal Revision under Section 397/401 Cr.P.C. is maintainable against the conviction and sentence of lower courts.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Phootey and Others
State of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
