The Hon'ble High Court, via Criminal Revision No. 1323 of 1998, reviewed the record wherein no one appeared. Finding no manifest error, illegality or procedural flaw in the conviction and sentence, the Hon'ble Court dismissed the revision.
The revision is dismissed. Any interim order, if any, is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1323 of 1998
Revisionist :- Sarfuddin And Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Counsel for Revisionist :- Jagdish Singh Sengar Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow or dismiss the criminal revision concerning conviction, sentence and confirmation of conviction on appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sarfuddin And Others
State Of U.P.
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
