The Hon'ble Court dismissed the writ petition (filed in 2004), holding that the cause of action no longer survives, the matter had become infructuous, and the petitioner had lost interest, evidenced by the absence of counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 20225 of 2004
Petitioner :- Dineshwar Mishra And Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- S.P. Pandey,S.K. Misra,Shashi Ranjan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
counsel for petitioner is absent.
Order Date :- 18.10.2019 AK
Dineshwar Mishra And Others
State Of U.P. And Others
Sudhir Agarwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
