A single-line order dismissing a writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner was not present despite a revised call. No substantive findings were recorded.
Disposal of the writ petition by dismissal for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPSB No. 481 of 2017 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. |
|||
| None is present for the petitioner even in the revised call. |
|||
| 2. Mr. P.S. Bisht, learned Addl. C.S.C. for the State. |
|||
| 3. Mr. Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel for respondent no. 1. |
|||
| 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. |
|||
| (Alok Mahra, J.) (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 07.10.2025 07.10.2025 Ujjwal |
Petitioner
The State
Respondent No. 1
Ravindra Maithani
Alok Mahra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
