An appeal against a Family Court order setting aside an ex parte judgment under Order IX Rule 13 CPC was disposed of as infructuous, since the underlying case had already been dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2025:UHC:8780-DB
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Appeal From Order No. 437 of 2024
06 October, 2025
Manwar Singh Rawat ………Appellant
Versus
Renu Rawat ………Respondent
Presence:-
Mr. Gaurav Paliwal, holding brief of Mr. Nalin Saun, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. Maneesh Bisht, learned counsel for respondent.
Coram: Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J. Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The challenge in this appeal is made to order the order dated 08.08.2024 passed in Misc. Case No. 139 of 2021, connected with Original Case No. 963 of 2015, Smt. Renu Rawat vs. Manwar Singh Rawat (“the case”), whereby the learned Judge, Family Court, has allowed the respondent’s application under Order IX Rule 13 C.P.C. and set aside the ex parte judgment dated 15.03.2016 passed in the case.
(Alok Mahra, J.) (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 06.10.2025 06.10.2025
Mamta
MA Digitally signed by MAMTA RANI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6a812005bebfcf46f244f3e 584af1449e430ef900bf09a6d67ebb d642671329b, postalCode=263001, MTA st=Uttarakhand, serialNumber=5de1751a4f1d9cabf d54852c9e68911ca8b66dd26690a1 91648ab5d8dd004ef0, cn=MAMTA RANI Date: 2025.10.07 10:32:07 +05'30' RANI
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Manwar Singh Rawat
Renu Rawat
Alok Mahra
Ravindra Maithani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
