Allowed
Bharat Bhushan v. State of Uttarakhand
Uttarakhand HCSPA/298/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
What the court decided
AI extract
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | SPA No. 298 of 2016 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. None is present for the appellant even in the revised call. M.S. Bisht, Brief Holder for the State. The appeal is dismissed in non prosecution. |
||
| (Alok Mahra, J.) (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 06.10.2025 Jitendra |
State
Ravindra Maithani
Alok Mahra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court