Dismissed¶1
Nand Ram v. Anil Kumar
Uttarakhand HCSPA/1006/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Special appeal (SPA No.1006 of 2017) dismissed as infructuous on the ground of efflux of time; submission made at the outset by counsel for the appellants (Mr. Ajay Veer Pundir); State represented by Standing Counsel Mr. Sushil Vashistha; Bench: Ravindra Maithani, J. and Alok Mahra, J.; decided 07.10.2025. No statutory provisions or precedents discussed; no merits adjudicated.
What did the court decide?
Accepting the submission made at the outset by learned counsel for the appellant that the appeal had become infructuous with the passage of time, the Court dismissed the appeal as having been rendered infructuous. ¶1