In a writ petition, the court allowed the petitioner's application for withdrawal of the petition based on a submitted affidavit and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn.
Withdrawal application allowed; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| WPSS No. 835 of 2022 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. Mr. Nikhil Bhatt, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Dushyant Mainali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate for respondent no. 1. Mr. Devesh Ghildiyal, Standing Counsel for the Union of India/ respondent no. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. This withdrawal application (I.A. No. 3 of 2022) has been filed on behalf of petitioner. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that since the Public Service Commission has permitted petitioner to appear in the examination, therefore, petitioner does not want to press the writ petition. In view of the facts mentioned in the affidavit filed in support of withdrawal application, withdrawal application is allowed. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 10.11.2022 Navin |
Petitioner
Union of India
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
