Raju Pandit v. State of Uttarakhand through Secretary Home Secretariat Dehradun
Uttarakhand HCBA2/4/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
| SL. No |
Date | Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures |
COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS |
|---|---|---|---|
| BA2 4 / 2 0 1 9 Hon’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Sachin Panwar, Brief Holder, for the State. |
|||
| This Court vide order dated 3.11.2022 granted time to learned Brief Holder to get instruction regarding stage of trial. Today, Mr. Sachin Panwar, learned Brief Holder for the State, on instruction, makes a statement that the trial against the applicant has resulted in his acquittal for the charge of offences punishable under Sections 302 and 201 IPC. Since applicant has been acquitted, therefore, this second bail application has become infructuous and it is dismissed as such. ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 9 .1 1 .2 0 2 2 Pr |